Community College

Facility Coalition

Updated November 7, 2008

 

Updated November 10, 2008

 

Community College Facility Coalition

Legislative Update — July 9, 1998

CCFC Phone (916) 441-3300

BUDGET AND BOND LOGJAMS CONTINUE TO STIR — In three brief sessions that seem to have completed final action on the State Budget, the Budget Conference Committee is now focused on the budget trailer bills, which will be extraordinarily complex this year. Last Wednesday the Committee met for a brief hearing in which the budget was riddled with $700 million in expenditure reductions. Of this amount $300 million was in K-12 education, $94 million in UC and CSU, and the remainder was scattered throughout the non education portion of the budget. Interestingly the community colleges escaped this strafing attack by the Budget Committee, which most observers believe is a precursor to some sort of budget and tax reduction package.

In a related action, the Assembly and Senate both approved a 1 year ¼¢ reduction in the State sales tax. The Governor in his usual imperious way vetoed the bill before the ink was dry. This action is part of a presumed necessary ritual to final agreement on the ultimate tax package.

On the bond front, a new stirring took place late Wednesday, when Assembly Speaker Villaraigosa offered a set of amendments to SB 50 (O'Connell) that were actually amended into the bill. Several previous sets of amendments proposed for that bill were never actually amended into it. None of this Assembly activity on SB 50 should be construed to reflect Senator O'Connell's views on a school bond. He is unfortunate or fortunate enough to have a relatively germane bill on the Assembly 3rd reading file, which makes it an easy target for the current series of Assembly histrionics.

This form of SB 50 has a lot to like for those who would like to see a bond placed on the November 1998 ballot which is unencumbered by the contentious issues of developer fees, program reform and local bond approval levels that have accompanied previous proposals. The bill provides a $4.5 billion bond of which $1.25 billion would be for higher education during the 1998-2000 period. The odds of this bill leaving the Assembly Floor are long, but it also is part of a perceived necessary step to bring the issue to conclusion. It is also aimed at beating the July 13th deadline for making the regular November 1998 ballot. Most observers believe that the August 27th deadline for a supplemental November ballot is the real deadline. Current plans are that SB 50 will be considered on the Assembly Floor some time tomorrow.

PREBID QUALIFICATION BILL CANDIDATE FOR 28.8 — AB 1921 (Scott) the bill to authorize prebid qualification for community college construction projects is scheduled for a hearing in the Senate Appropriations Committee on Monday, July 13th. CCFC has been dogging the Senate Appropriations Committee staff to clear the bill from the Committee under Senate Rule 28.8. This rule allows bills to be sent to the Senate Floor without a hearing if the bill has minimal cost and makes no appropriation. AB 1921 clearly meets the parameters of this rule, but the rule is employed at the discretion of the committee chair. Even if a hearing is required, there appears to be no opposition to the current form of the bill.

 

For more information, contact Paul Holmes or Shannon Mahoney.

1130 K Street, Suite 210, Sacramento, California   95814

Voice: 916.446.3042 --  Fax: 916.441.3893